If we have to release some illegals, should it only be in Sanctuary Cities?

If there's one thing you can totally count on when it comes to rich Liberals, it's that they embody the 'not in my backyard' side of America.

Over the last few days, more and more of them are getting louder on the subject.

What was the spark? Well we are having to release some illegal aliens into the country because our detention centers simply won't hold them. The President has suggested that we should do this just in Sanctuary Cities.

First up - Nancy Pelosi who of course represents the incredibly rich San Francisco where us mere mortals cannot afford to live.

The Washington Post first reported that the White House proposed sending the detainees to sanctuary cities, including Pelosi's district, twice in the last six months. The idea was rejected, but the President gave it new life.

Pelosi's spokeswoman Ashley Etienne released a statement Friday saying: “Using human beings - including little children - as pawns in their warped game to perpetuate fear and demonize immigrants is despicable, and in some cases, criminal. The American people have resoundingly rejected this Administration’s toxic anti-immigrant policies, and Democrats will continue to advance immigration policies that keep us safe and honor our values.”

Meanwhile over the weekend, Cher of all people, took to Twitter. “I Understand Helping struggling Immigrants, but MY CITY (Los Angeles) ISNT TAKING CARE OF ITS OWN.WHAT ABOUT THE 50,000+Citizens WHO LIVE ON THE STREETS.PPL WHO LIVE BELOW POVERTY LINE,& HUNGRY? If My State Can’t Take Care of Its Own(Many Are VETS)How Can it Take Care Of More,” she wrote (exactly as shown!).

So the question now becomes, if we have to release some illegals, should it only be in Sanctuary Cities?

Take part in today's Poll...

Our polls are not scientific and are for entertainment

NEWSRADIO 1040 WHO · Des Moines' news, traffic, and severe weather station!

Listen Now on iHeartRadio

outbrain pixel